From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
Date: | 2018-06-07 07:00:29 |
Message-ID: | CAKt_Zfv7aqMg-PJph2XOameq_3tNZ1GjwGS8O1pDdaPGkBd8FQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:14 AM, Jan Claeys <lists(at)janc(dot)be> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 07:27 +0200, Chris Travers wrote:
> > The real fear here is the code of conduct being co-opted as a weapon
> > of world-wide culture war and that's what is driving a lot of the
> > resistance here. This is particularly an American problem here and
> > it causes a lot of resistance among people who were, until the
> > second world war, subject to some pretty serious problems by colonial
> > powers.
>
> I don't see how this could happen any more than it already can, because
> as far as I can tell the goal is not to discuss complaints in public;
> the committee would handle cases in private. And if committee members
> would try to abuse their power, I'm pretty sure they would be removed.
>
Right. I think the fears are overblown but you do have to remember that we
started this whole public side of the process when there was a real effort
by some in around open source to push contributor codes of conducts that
were expressly political (the Contributor Covenant for example) and in the
wake of Opalgate.
I do not doubt that at some point we will face the same. I don't doubt
that such efforts will be unsuccessful. But I do think they will put the
project through some public controversy and grief and so we are best off to
try to minimize the attack surface.
>
> > Putting a bunch of American lawyers, psychologists, sociologists,
> > marketers etc on the board in the name of diversity would do way more
> > harm than good.
>
> I didn't say they have to be American, and I didn't say there has to be
> a bunch of them. I just said it would be good if there were also
> people who aren't (just only) developers, DBAs or other very technical
> people.
>
Ok I get what your concern is now. I am not sure the formal qualifications
matter but I would agree that the committee needs to be staffed with people
we trust to be good "people people" rather than good "tech people."
>
>
> --
> Jan Claeys
>
>
--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-07 20:57:36 | Code of Conduct committee: call for volunteers |
Previous Message | Jan Claeys | 2018-06-07 00:14:48 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pablo Hendrickx | 2018-06-07 08:04:41 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
Previous Message | Viktor Fougstedt | 2018-06-07 05:45:05 | Fast seralizable transactions starving slower ones |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-06-07 07:03:22 | Re: Fix obsolete comment |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-06-07 06:43:13 | Fix obsolete comment |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anthony DeBarros | 2018-06-07 14:14:49 | New book: Practical SQL |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-06-07 04:47:21 | Re: SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack |