| From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gmail <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What's new in PostgreSQL 9.2 |
| Date: | 2012-08-28 09:29:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAKt_ZfuSxmqtDAYeHr3fZcKD32+-g0en5seRJ-BLLZWNSCXatg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Gmail <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've finished writing the "What's new" for 9.2. Here it is:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/What%27s_new_in_PostgreSQL_9.2
>
> Please, proof-read it, English isn't my native language.
>
> As usual, I had to make choices about what to present here. If your
> favorite feature isn't here, please add it, or tell me about it :)
>
> A couple points
1) CHECK ... NO INHERIT should get its own heading. It isn't really a
matter of a NOT VALID check constraint.
2) I don't know how these are getting ranked but the SECURITY BARRIER bit
might do better as a major feature. It has the potential to be a total
game changer in the way multi-tenant applications are developed and viewed.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Cousin | 2012-08-28 12:29:35 | Re: What's new in PostgreSQL 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Marc Cousin | 2012-08-28 08:01:28 | Re: What's new in PostgreSQL 9.2 |