Re: A motion

From: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A motion
Date: 2016-01-24 11:59:18
Message-ID: CAKt_ZftZ3cOXLTKxJWj8xhvmPqnSpx-mVo9rPqw=3h68pdMjFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2016-01-23 15:31:02 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > With respect Adrian, that is a motion that never stands a chance. If you
> > don't want to read it, set up a filter that sends it right to the round
> > file.
>
> It'd help if there weren't six, but one thread...
>

It would also help if threads were clearly marked in the subject ;-) Ok,
in context I can figure out what the motion probably concerns, but a
computer cannot.....

>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2016-01-24 12:08:39 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right
Previous Message Chris Travers 2016-01-24 10:34:12 Re: CoC [Final v2]