Re: WIP: CoC V5

From: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brian Dunavant <brian(at)omniti(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: CoC V5
Date: 2016-01-13 07:46:44
Message-ID: CAKt_ZftEOMW2nQLmfPfKqD2P0XhSnExA9Wu3wqfDGW-xBas5cw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Still trying the Danish "Make Love not Codes" approach (Love being the
plural of the Danish Lov meaning law).

1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a
safe, respectful, productive, and collaborative place for any person who is
willing to contribute in a safe, respectful, productive and collaborative
way. This CoC is only about interaction via community channels or relating
to community commons. Your personal lives outside the PostgreSQL community
are your own.

2. Please be respectful of others. Understand that the community is about
collaboration. We are here to build and further a software project, so
let's work together.

3. Please try to assume that perceived slights are the result of genuine
miscommunication or different perspective not personal attacks. Assume
others are being reasonable.

4. Please respect the common work and the need for high quality of code.
Understand that the review process is an opportunity for discussion and
improvement. Work to further the community and the software, and assume
that others are doing the same.

5. The CoC committee, those they designate may take action as needed to
facilitate or, as necessary, take action to enforce the community
principles and conduct embodied in this CoC. For affiliated projects, the
maintainers of the project or those they designate may fill the same role
instead.

=====

I am going to reiterate my view that a rules approach is not going to
really prevent problems and those who want to harass others can often use
codes of conduct as weapons to do so. I would rather see something as
general as possible.emphasizing what we want rather than what we want to
avoid.

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:

> tl;dr;
>
> * Moved #2 to #3 and #3 to #2
> * Added wording for assuming positive intent to #2
>
> PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC):
>
> 1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a
> safe, respectful, productive, and collaborative place for any person who is
> willing to contribute in a safe, respectful, productive and collaborative
> way.
>
> 2. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of
> personal attacks and disparaging remarks of any kind.
>
> 3. The CoC is not about being offended. One should always assume good
> intentions. As with any diverse community, anyone can get offended at
> anything.
>
> 4. Any sustained disruption of the collaborative space (mailing lists, IRC
> etc..) or other PostgreSQL events shall be construed as a violation of the
> CoC and appropriate action will be taken by the CoC committee.
>
> 5. The CoC is only about interaction with the PostgreSQL community. Your
> private and public lives outside of the PostgreSQL community are your own.
>
>
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
> Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
> control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2016-01-13 08:00:55 Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?
Previous Message Chris Travers 2016-01-13 07:32:18 Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?