From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Karl Nack <karlnack(at)futurityinc(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Implementing "thick"/"fat" databases |
Date: | 2011-07-27 14:19:33 |
Message-ID: | CAKt_ZftELMG-Lxa9DQkWbWR4mXp3xgJ-nsXS7DQCdEMb4xVqNA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Note, we wrote libpqtypes (http://libpqtypes.esilo.com/) precisely to
> deal with this problem -- first class handling of arrays and
> composites in the client. It's not much help for a perl client, but I
> think similar methodologies can be made for most languages. Sending
> rich data structures directly to procedures in the database transforms
> the way the application/database communications work for the better.
> It's new and weird to many developers, especially those trained on ORM
> usage patterns, but is also entirely effective.
>
Cool :-)
As I understand it DBD::Pg has excellent handling of both these things
too. The reason we are not doing more with the composite types yet is
because we currently support versions of DBD::Pg which support arrays
well but not the composite types, though that will probably change in
1.4.
I wonder which other languages have first class support for these areas of Pg?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Toby Corkindale | 2011-07-27 14:30:41 | Re: repmgr problem with registering standby |
Previous Message | Willy-Bas Loos | 2011-07-27 14:09:24 | does slony use work_mem? |