From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Sébastien Lorion <sl(at)thestrangefactory(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
Date: | 2012-09-13 04:40:36 |
Message-ID: | CAKt_ZfsRMf9ZBVZ7fZXyhx8hd0kFCWXHnCr-uwZwHEMuWWrXjw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr> wrote:
> Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 01:33 -0400, Sébastien Lorion a écrit :
>
> >
> >
> > Since Amazon has added new high I/O instance types and EBS volumes,
> > anyone has done some benchmark of PostgreSQL on them ?
> >
>
> I wonder : is there a reason why you have to go through the complexity
> of such a setup, rather than simply use bare metal and get good
> performance with simplicity?
>
> For instance, the dedibox I use for my app (visible in sig) costs 14,00
> euros/month, and sits at .03% load average with 5 active users; you can
> admin it like a home pc.
>
The main use cases I know of are relatively small instances where the web
server and db server for an app may be on the same system.
>
>
> --
> Vincent Veyron
> http://marica.fr/
> Gestion informatique des sinistres d'assurances et des dossiers
> contentieux pour le service juridique
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sébastien Lorion | 2012-09-13 05:01:11 | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
Previous Message | Mike Christensen | 2012-09-13 03:51:26 | Re: Where do I get pgAdmin 1.16 for openSuSE? |