Re: feature requests (possibly interested in working on this): functional foreign keys

From: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: feature requests (possibly interested in working on this): functional foreign keys
Date: 2013-02-07 16:01:01
Message-ID: CAKt_ZfsMev4CpUeSN6Fbcbg_v+fmEJoXAnoSGC-dpKXMTtYSow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

(Forgot to CC the list)

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > What would be nice to be able to do is to be able to do something like:
> > ALTER TABLE inet_assignment ADD FOREIGN KEY (network(inet_address))
> > REFERENCES cidr_block(block_def);
>
> > 2. Are there any other major showstoppers I haven't thought of?
>
> The information_schema can't represent such a thing, and this is
> unfixable without breaking the SQL standard. I suppose we could omit
> functional FK constraints from the information_schema views, but that's
> not terribly palatable.
>

If this were to be limited to table methods (i.e. functions where
relation.function notation works), would that be sufficiently workable?

>
> Have you considered just storing the network(inet_address) value in a
> separate column (maintained by a BEFORE INSERT/UPDATE trigger) and then
> using a regular FK with that?
>

I have. Honestly I think the UDF + check + trigger is cleaner.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zach Seaman 2013-02-07 16:01:28 Re: [NOVICE] Problems with ñ and tildes / CSV import problems in PostgreSQL 9.1
Previous Message Schnabel, Robert D. 2013-02-07 15:50:55 Re: 64 bit Win 2008, 32 bit client, ?bit Postgres?