| From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.1 got really fast ;) |
| Date: | 2011-10-15 20:59:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAKt_ZfsJ0SqpDsPNiWEhwUaTwWBq+YnACT59VOTNqZavaEJpoA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
> On 15 Oct 2011, at 21:20, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> >
> > Total runtime: -2.368 ms <<==== this is amazing ;)
> >
> wow :)
>
> > This is with 9.1.1 on a Windows XP machine
> That explains it ;)
>
>
> Are you saying that Windows XP is the ultimate server OS for high
performance PostgreSQL installations? Are there optimizations that this
platform can take advantage of, perhaps extending Pg timelines into actual
time travel that are not available on other platforms?
;-)
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2011-10-15 21:18:55 | Re: 9.1 got really fast ;) |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2011-10-15 20:33:22 | Re: 9.1 got really fast ;) |