Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

From: Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Date: 2012-01-16 23:10:01
Message-ID: CAKq0gvK5TnXBf+RK=PXUuYz9TULKEvxMeZFB8jL0112O5xPZ0g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 01/12/2012 11:57 AM, Scott Mead wrote:
>
>> Pretty delayed, but please find the attached patch that addresses all the
>> issues discussed.
>>
>
> The docs on this v4 look like they suffered a patch order problem here.
> In the v3, you added a whole table describing the pg_stat_activity
> documentation in more detail than before. v4 actually tries to remove
> those new docs, a change which won't even apply as they don't exist
> upstream.
>
> My guess is you committed v3 to somewhere, applied the code changes for
> v4, but not the documentation ones. It's easy to do that and end up with a
> patch that removes a bunch of docs the previous patch added. I have to be
> careful to always do something like "git diff origin/master" to avoid this
> class of problem, until I got into that habit I did this sort of thing
> regularly.
>
> gak

Okay, I'll fix that and the rules.out regression that I missed

--Scott
OpenSCG, http://www.openscg.com

>
> --
> Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
> PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-01-16 23:19:21 Re: Review of: pg_stat_statements with query tree normalization
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-01-16 22:48:47 Re: inconsistent comparison of CHECK constraints