Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command

From: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command
Date: 2019-09-23 11:44:44
Message-ID: CAKoxK+7JmSyOEC+uOixzj4HG5R4gdhFXUe6+DwavSzMLTVLWsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:55 AM Andreas Kretschmer
<andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de> wrote:
> you can use both of them, and you should consider "Barman".

If I remember well Barman uses pg_receivexlog when streaming, and
archive_command when doing a "normal" backup.
Also pgbackrest is another good tool for backup.
The idea here should be not reinventing the wheel.

Luca

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Kretschmer 2019-09-23 11:56:47 Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command
Previous Message Luca Ferrari 2019-09-23 11:39:19 unable to drop index because it does not exists