Re: questions about wraparound

From: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: questions about wraparound
Date: 2021-03-30 06:38:34
Message-ID: CAKoxK+6W5QgFNwbmv4TeWvQx9H_RadqmXW-XSPks6BM2v=OmwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 7:12 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> I didn't follow the rest of the thread, but autovacuum should handle
> those databases and advance their "datfrozenxid".

That did not happen.
In short: I turned off autovacuum globally, then in a database I
consumed a lot of xid while keeping a table locked. This produced a
wraparound in such database, but I was expecting emergency autovacuum
to keep other databases frozen. PostgreSQL 12.5.

Luca

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Seiler 2021-03-30 13:48:19 Re: Dangerous Naming Confusion
Previous Message Jagmohan Kaintura 2021-03-30 04:21:12 Re: PostgreSQL Views Where Clause Character Columns getting Typecasted to Text and Indexes not getting Used