Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?

From: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
Date: 2019-02-27 11:52:06
Message-ID: CAKoxK+57m-8pugYke+BYhYtPn4YYNJgzU8g21aMykEZmMdQgQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:33 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> You can see most obvious reasons at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247477

Thanks, I didn't see the lost+found problem because I'm on UFS (I'm
wondering if this applies also to ZFS datasetes with mount point).
Same story for the accidentally umount, since FreeBSD seems enough
friendly to avoid umount while the database is running, but it could
definetely happen with some brute force or on another operating
system.
I see the upgrade problem being a lot more general in this sense.
However, all are good points.

Luca

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2019-02-27 12:31:59 Re: Barman disaster recovery solution
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-02-27 11:33:02 Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?