From: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Олег Самойлов <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: stable for each row before insert trigger |
Date: | 2019-10-18 11:24:12 |
Message-ID: | CAKoxK+51uQ71w1mR9_Rqrg7Bw8rvt3f-Bt01qON=_MykievWTQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM Олег Самойлов <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru> wrote:
> > STABLE indicates .... (It is inappropriate for AFTER triggers that wish to query rows modified by the current command.)
>
> So, STABLE is inappropriate for such trigger, but is appropriate for BEFORE trigger?
>
Well, a before trigger will not see data changes in any way, so I read
it as "it does not matter for before triggers".
And I would speculate that, being in a trigger, the function is
invoked every time, so there should not be any caching that produces
performance boosts.
> For instance, I expect that the FOR EACH ROW BEFORE trigger marked as STABLE will be faster than VOLATILE without important negative side effects. I observed 3% benefit. IMMUTABLE trigger is slightly slower then STABLE, but I am not sure, too low difference.
It could be faster, but I would not speculate on that rather than an
inling of the code.
Luca
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2019-10-18 11:47:05 | Re: Postgres Point in time Recovery (PITR), |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2019-10-18 11:13:31 | Re: Execute a function through fdw |