From: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hint in determining effective_io_concurrency |
Date: | 2021-04-22 19:54:56 |
Message-ID: | CAKoxK+40Rf9rMZhZVZi4V9grRQdxVymEXQTRPaYET7dOJJxD4Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:52 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:45:15PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm unable to find (apparently) a way to find out a possible value to
> > start with for effective_io_concurrency.
> > I suspect that benchmarking, e.g., using bonnie++ or sysbench and
> > testing with different values of concurrency could help to determine
> > the max number of concurrent request, (tps, lower latency, ecc.).
> > Is thjs correct or is there another suggested way?
>
> I recommend 256 for SSDs or other RAM-like fsync systems, and maybe
> maybe 16 for magnetic.
Thanks Bruce, this is a very good starting point.
But is there a rationale about those numbers? I mean, if I change the
storage system, how should I set a correct number?
Luca
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-04-22 19:58:27 | Re: hint in determining effective_io_concurrency |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-04-22 19:52:32 | Re: hint in determining effective_io_concurrency |