From: | Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | is this a known bug in 9.6? |
Date: | 2016-12-13 11:42:02 |
Message-ID: | CAKkG4_=gjY5QiHtqSZyWMwDuTd_CftKoTaCqxjJ7uUz1-Gw=qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
this is a stock PGDG 9.6:
postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)), j(y) as (values (2::int)) select
x from (select x from i union all select y from j) b;
x
---
1
2
(2 rows)
postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)), j(y) as (values (2::int)) select
max(x) from (select x from i union all select y from j) b;
ERROR: could not find plan for CTE "i"
The same on 9.5:
postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)), j(y) as (values (2::int)) select
x from (select x from i union all select y from j) b;
x
---
1
2
(2 rows)
postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)), j(y) as (values (2::int)) select
max(x) from (select x from i union all select y from j) b;
max
-----
2
(1 row)
Is this a bug or is my assumption that this should work wrong?
Both the aggregate and the UNION are required to trigger the bug:
postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)) select x from (select x from i
union all select 3::int) b;
x
---
1
3
(2 rows)
postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)) select max(x) from (select x from
i) b;
max
-----
1
(1 row)
postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)) select max(x) from (select x from
i union all select 3::int) b;
ERROR: could not find plan for CTE "i"
Thanks,
Torsten
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dorian Hoxha | 2016-12-13 13:09:32 | When updating row that has TOAST column, is the TOAST column also reinserted ? Or just the oid to the value? |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2016-12-13 10:34:08 | Re: pg_upgrade 9.0 to 9.6 |