Re: vacuum freeze in 96

From: Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuum freeze in 96
Date: 2016-12-14 09:12:23
Message-ID: CAKkG4_=eekiyZ6d5+n7uyjAL-t4UZc28obVqwgr_o6x8ZV+p7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > one of the major enhancements in 96 is skipping completely frozen pages
> in
> > vacuum freeze. I assume that requires a special bit on the page.
>
> The freeze map uses an additional bit in the vm, and pg_upgrade would
> take care of the conversion.
>

Thanks. That makes sense.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikhail 2016-12-14 09:47:33 Re[2]: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade 9.0 to 9.6
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2016-12-14 07:18:57 Re: pg_dump and quoted identifiers