| From: | "Maeldron T(dot)" <maeldron(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Streaming replication bandwith per table |
| Date: | 2017-07-06 00:45:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAKatfSnHF=_4RiFmxTL_YmEDS1nT+Q_kVhup=6KvRsnFNKwhtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you.
Maybe it would help, but recently I had another issue with the tables
having large arrays. I likely will redesign that part of the application,
and I’ll see if it helps as a side effect.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/21/17 22:04, Maeldron T. wrote:
> > * Logical replication is in 10.0 Beta 1. I might be oldschool but I
> > would install 10.1 or maybe 10.0.2 into production
>
> There are also other logical replication options such as pglogical and
> londiste.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2017-07-06 00:58:08 | Re: Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied? |
| Previous Message | Jason Dusek | 2017-07-06 00:34:41 | Re: Imperative Query Languages |