From: | Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New sessions on a database to be dropped consume 100% cpu |
Date: | 2018-11-26 09:12:36 |
Message-ID: | CAK_s-G3SP71oabtJ2F_Wt-WEUk6YwNF2W+VRO8KHk57bDwfJ1Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> If you could install amcheck and see what it thinks about those indexes,
> that would be interesting.
I created a backup (using pg_basebackup) from this cluster and had a look:
name_to_be_dropped=# select
bt_index_check('pg_catalog.pg_depend_depender_index');
ERROR: cross page item order invariant violated for index
"pg_depend_depender_index"
DETAIL: Last item on page tid=(255,138) page lsn=33A5/F47BC3B0.
> Of course, if you're just wishing you could get rid of the database,
> you could forcibly kill those processes and move on.
Unfortunately other databases are still serving a useful purpose on the
same cluster
and it seems my only recourse would be restart the whole cluster, as I
currently can't
kill them using SIGTERM.
Thanks,
Feike
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-11-26 14:02:12 | Re: BUG #15520: PAM authentication + domain socket -> DNS query for symbolic hostname [local] |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-11-25 22:30:06 | Re: BUG #15520: PAM authentication + domain socket -> DNS query for symbolic hostname [local] |