Re: Add regression tests for autocommit-off mode for psql and fix some omissions

From: Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add regression tests for autocommit-off mode for psql and fix some omissions
Date: 2014-10-06 13:49:37
Message-ID: CAK_s-G1O__a+S4Z3kKeTq20kxM70NHPxTpTMEA7SgmAxx0p=sQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6 October 2014 14:09, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> That's a good catch and it should be a separate patch. This could even be
> considered for a back-patch down to 9.2. Thoughts?

If I isolate "DROP INDEX concurrently", this patch would do the trick.

Attachment Content-Type Size
20141006_drop_index_concurrently.patch application/octet-stream 766 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-10-06 13:53:14 Re: Commitfest: patches Ready for Committer
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-10-06 13:45:15 Re: Failure with make check-world for pgtypeslib/dt_test2 with HEAD on OSX