From: | Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add hint about replication slots when nearing wraparound |
Date: | 2017-12-27 07:47:20 |
Message-ID: | CAK_s-G0hAUCoEcv6VF05d9Svw2SDMxSvgM6nWTKES63Kp3w5-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 23 December 2017 at 11:58, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:55:19AM +0100, Feike Steenbergen wrote:
>> On 21 December 2017 at 05:32, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > Don't you want to put that in its own <caution> block? That's rather
>> > important not to miss for administrators.
>>
>> I didn't want to add yet another block on that documentation page,
>> as it already has 2, however it may be good to upgrade the
>> note to a caution, similar to the prepared transaction caution.
>
> Yes, I agree with this position.
Changed the block from a note to a caution,
regards,
Feike
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0003-Add-hint-about-replication-slots-for-wraparound.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-12-27 07:49:07 | Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-12-27 07:44:25 | Re: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a running backend |