Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback

From: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback
Date: 2025-03-24 09:24:30
Message-ID: CAKZiRmzuJv9va__=C6wjVwjFQOjzb+g_E053R8mD5rxtUsU8aA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:31 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 11:46, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:44 PM Jakub Wartak
> >
> > I can go with the last patch as you observed that in a real-world
> > case, and we can look at others (if any) on a case-to-case basis.
> > Fujii-San, others, do you have any opinion on this?
>
> +1 for this approach.
>

OK, so I have set this as Ready for Committer (I assume everybody who
wanted to take voice already did).

-J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shlok Kyal 2025-03-24 09:33:14 Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
Previous Message Tender Wang 2025-03-24 09:19:12 Re: Add mention in docs about locking all partitions for generic plans