| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback |
| Date: | 2025-03-31 14:58:35 |
| Message-ID: | 6e6ca77b-122c-49c4-bf89-a18dc62233d4@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24.03.25 10:24, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:31 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 11:46, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:44 PM Jakub Wartak
>>>
>>> I can go with the last patch as you observed that in a real-world
>>> case, and we can look at others (if any) on a case-to-case basis.
>>> Fujii-San, others, do you have any opinion on this?
>>
>> +1 for this approach.
>>
>
> OK, so I have set this as Ready for Committer (I assume everybody who
> wanted to take voice already did).
committed
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-03-31 14:59:13 | Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability |
| Previous Message | Seth Robertson | 2025-03-31 14:56:40 | Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq v1 |