Re: Configurable FP_LOCK_SLOTS_PER_BACKEND

From: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Jeremy Schneider <schnjere(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Matt Smiley <msmiley(at)gitlab(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Configurable FP_LOCK_SLOTS_PER_BACKEND
Date: 2024-09-23 07:04:02
Message-ID: CAKZiRmzF6eJr__Hyj8aCcT51pOPxo2Bux02sW9z-mpCFoNXNeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Good morning!

FYI: I know many people are/were tracking this email thread rather
than the newer and more recent one "scalability bottlenecks with
(many) partitions (and more)", but please see [1] [2] , where Tomas
committed enhanced fast-path locking to the master(18).

Thanks Tomas for persistence on this!

-J.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1ss4gX-000IvX-63%40gemulon.postgresql.org
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7c1eeafb-2375-4ff6-8469-0640d52d44ed%40vondra.me

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-09-23 07:05:25 Re: Add memory/disk usage for WindowAgg nodes in EXPLAIN
Previous Message Tender Wang 2024-09-23 06:40:00 Re: not null constraints, again