From: | Jaime Soler <jaime(dot)soler(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2016-12-21 12:12:35 |
Message-ID: | CAKVUGgTwF3E14Qa65fRF051M7MqF=n=w6NJMSh32oy93gbGBCA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
if you want to reduce the impact of reindex in your inserts and updates
operations why don't you try drop index and CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
As Alban said you I don't recommend you to execute reindex every hour, at
least try to reduce the scope of the reindex to the minimal object.
2016-12-21 12:51 GMT+01:00 Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Dear Alban,
>
> In my production system, there are lot of read write operation performed
> every hour.
> So, i am thinking, if i can add check during REINDEX operation nothing
> update and insert operation performed.
> Is it possible?
>
> Regards,
> Yogesh
>
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2016, Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 21 December 2016 at 09:59, Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> > Also, every hour,i am performing VACUUM and REINDEX operation on table.
>>
>> Why are you running REINDEX every hour? That's a very unusual thing to
>> do, you'd need a pretty good reason for that.
>>
>> --
>> If you can't see the forest for the trees,
>> Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yogesh Sharma | 2016-12-21 12:28:01 | Re: |
Previous Message | Yogesh Sharma | 2016-12-21 11:51:41 | Re: |