Re: 2 questions about volatile attribute of pg_proc.

From: Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2 questions about volatile attribute of pg_proc.
Date: 2021-04-20 02:55:53
Message-ID: CAKU4AWrKKwCetTJsnpGutHmE19FKCEbeudrDV-B839_5gPrePA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I'm listening to any obvious reason to reject it.
>
> Any obvious reason to reject it because of it would be a lose battle for
sure,
so I would not waste time on it. Or vote up if you think it is possible and
useful.

--
Best Regards
Andy Fan (https://www.aliyun.com/)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2021-04-20 02:57:00 Re: 2 questions about volatile attribute of pg_proc.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-20 02:50:34 amcheck eating most of the runtime with wal_consistency_checking