From: | Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |
Date: | 2020-05-22 06:10:29 |
Message-ID: | CAKU4AWr++rKSJRXKxi7K=pyMyx5VWo+VcM4_fHEMy2j2=_sKBQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:49 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Le jeu. 21 mai 2020 à 09:17, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> a
> écrit :
>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:49:53AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 4:29 AM Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Thanks for the excellent extension. I want to add 5 more fields to
>> satisfy the
>> >> following requirements.
>> >>
>> >> int subplan; /* No. of subplan in this query */
>> >> int subquery; /* No. of subquery */
>> >> int joincnt; /* How many relations are joined */
>> >> bool hasagg; /* if we have agg function in this query */
>> >> bool hasgroup; /* has group clause */
>> >
>> > Most of those fields can be computed using the raw sql satements. Why
>> > not adding functions like query_has_agg(querytext) to get the
>> > information from pgss stored query text instead?
>>
>> Yeah I personally find concepts related only to the query string
>> itself not something that needs to be tied to pg_stat_statements.
>> ...
>>
>
> Indeed cte will bring additional concerns about the fields semantics.
> That's another good reason to go with external functions so you can add
> extra parameters for that if needed.
>
>>
There are something more we can't get from query string easily. like:
1. view involved. 2. subquery are pulled up so there is not subquery
indeed. 3. sublink are pull-up or become as an InitPlan rather than
subPlan.
4. joins are removed by remove_useless_joins.
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | chenhj | 2020-05-22 06:15:57 | Re: [Proposal] Page Compression for OLTP |
Previous Message | Suraj Kharage | 2020-05-22 06:03:29 | Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup |