Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not?

From: Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Astapov <dastapov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not?
Date: 2022-05-17 02:00:35
Message-ID: CAKU4AWoJby_fNeEhtiy==bxh-p4z5U66Y1xgZVRFXur-6fYDkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 6:52 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 3:22 PM Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here is the latest code. I have rebased the code with the latest master
> a1bc4d3590b.
>
> FYI this is failing with an unexpected plan in the partition_join test:
>
>
> https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6090435050340352/log/src/test/regress/regression.diffs
>

Thanks. But I will wait to see if anyone will show interest with this. Or
else
Moving alone is not a great experience.

--
Best Regards
Andy Fan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-05-17 02:04:57 Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-05-17 01:56:09 Re: Minor improvements to test log navigability