Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review

From: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Date: 2014-11-18 20:30:04
Message-ID: CAKRt6CTs-X-OKE5w2PWG5rmuZzz+f6AY-b0NHaQXgu9GchRc9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

All,

> 2. Catalog Representation:
>
> Condense all attributes in pg_authid to single int64 column and create
> bitmasks accordingly.
>

I have been working on these changes and I was hoping for some
assistance/recommendations.

Currently, I am using int32 simply because int64 is causing some issues.
The issue is that genbki.pl is not able to associate it with the int8 type
as defined in pg_type.h. Therefore Schema_pg_authid in schemapg.h isn't
defined correctly. I've been digging and scratching my head on this one
but I have reached a point where I think it would be better just to ask.

Any thoughts or recommendations on how I should approach this?

-Adam

--
Adam Brightwell - adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2014-11-18 20:32:34 Re: 9.5: Better memory accounting, towards memory-bounded HashAgg
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-11-18 20:27:19 Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement