| From: | Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: sequence data type |
| Date: | 2017-04-13 10:40:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAKOSWNmCjq5aq-mr3BxttBv11z1moWG3AYBU3tW5_0unp=hcCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/4/17, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/30/17 22:47, Vitaly Burovoy wrote:
>> It seemed not very hard to fix it.
>> Please find attached patch to be applied on top of your one.
>>
>> I've added more tests to cover different cases of changing bounds when
>> data type is changed.
>
> Committed all that. Thanks!
Thank you very much!
--
Best regards,
Vitaly Burovoy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitaly Burovoy | 2017-04-13 10:40:52 | Re: identity columns |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-04-13 10:23:39 | Shouldn't duplicate addition to publication be a no-op? |