Re: Feature: temporary materialized views

From: Mitar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Date: 2019-03-14 08:13:51
Message-ID: CAKLmikODyu0Nsb=rNq276LXBt-xUmrKpJJXRYNODZjL=ixuUMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

I just want to make sure if I understand correctly. But my initial
proposal/patch is currently waiting first for all patches for the
refactoring to happen, which are done by amazing Andreas? This sounds
good to me and I see a lot of progress/work has been done and I am OK
with waiting. Please ping me explicitly if there will be anything I am
expected to do at any point in time.

And just to make sure, these current patches are doing just
refactoring but are not also introducing temporary materialized views
yet? Or is that also done in patches made by Andreas?

Mitar

--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2019-03-14 08:17:21 Re: COPY FREEZE and setting PD_ALL_VISIBLE/visibility map bits
Previous Message Edmund Horner 2019-03-14 08:12:15 Re: Tid scan improvements