Re: PATCH/s: RM#1387 - Bad handling of missing connection database server

From: Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH/s: RM#1387 - Bad handling of missing connection database server
Date: 2016-08-24 09:47:11
Message-ID: CAKKotZSb5tU-485UmVytDMsgG_UFycLWhc_mA4XxJkpiCaPWOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Ashesh,

Here are few scenario I tried which does not like working properly,

1) "properties" dialog do not open for any object while I'm able to open
"create" dialog

2) Click & connect the server, Now go to Statistics tab, you will see blank
alert info
[Console error] statistics.js:216 Uncaught ReferenceError: that is not
defined

3) Open "Create" dialog fill information, Stop DB & then click on Save
button.
[Console error] pgadmin.defaults.js:90 Uncaught TypeError:
xhr.getResponseHeader is not a function

4) If pgAdmin4 is running & database is connected, Now if database goes
down (eg: stop db service),
server stays as connected & there are no error from application when we
traverse between tabs.

5) If pgAdmin4 is running & one or more server is connected, Now if any
database server goes down (eg: stop db service)
Refresh entire page now click on expand server-group, loading/expanding
server group goes infinite.

Thanks,
Murtuza

--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Ashesh Vashi <
> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Ashesh Vashi <
>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2016 15:08, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yeah, but shouldn't it be caught and handled, with a suitable retry
>>> yes/no in the UI?
>>> And, that realised me, I missed one case, on which I am already working.
>>>
>> Please find the updated patches.
>>
> Thanks - Murtuza for point out the issue.
>
> The patches were not generated from the latest changes.
> Please find the updated patches.
>
> --
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Ashesh Vashi
> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>
>
> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Ashesh Vashi
>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>>
>>
>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>
>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Dave Page
>>> > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> > Twitter: @pgsnake
>>> >
>>> > EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>> >
>>> > On 20 Aug 2016, at 12:03, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Can you re-base please? The nodes patch no longer applies.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Ignoring that conflict though, the first test I did was to restart
>>> the app server when connected to a database. I then (after it restarted) to
>>> open the Schemas node in that database; nothing happened at all in the
>>> client, but on the server I saw:
>>> >>
>>> >> This exception suggests that - pgAdmin 4 was not able to establish
>>> the connection again during restarting it.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks & Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> Ashesh Vashi
>>> >> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2016-08-19 16:59:16,321: INFO werkzeug: 127.0.0.1 - - [19/Aug/2016
>>> 16:59:16] "GET /browser/schema/nodes/1/1/219759/ HTTP/1.1" 500 -
>>> >>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
>>> line 2000, in __call__
>>> >>> return self.wsgi_app(environ, start_response)
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
>>> line 1991, in wsgi_app
>>> >>> response = self.make_response(self.handle_exception(e))
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
>>> line 1567, in handle_exception
>>> >>> reraise(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
>>> line 1988, in wsgi_app
>>> >>> response = self.full_dispatch_request()
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
>>> line 1641, in full_dispatch_request
>>> >>> rv = self.handle_user_exception(e)
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
>>> line 1544, in handle_user_exception
>>> >>> reraise(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
>>> line 1639, in full_dispatch_request
>>> >>> rv = self.dispatch_request()
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
>>> line 1625, in dispatch_request
>>> >>> return self.view_functions[rule.endpoint](**req.view_args)
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/views.py",
>>> line 84, in view
>>> >>> return self.dispatch_request(*args, **kwargs)
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/utils.py",
>>> line 235, in dispatch_request
>>> >>> return method(*args, **kwargs)
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups
>>> /servers/databases/schemas/__init__.py", line 129, in wrap
>>> >>> self.conn = self.manager.connection(did=kwargs['did'])
>>> >>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/utils/driver/psycopg2/__init__.py",
>>> line 1330, in connection
>>> >>> raise Exception(msg_active_conn)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I realise it could well be caused by the conflict when applying the
>>> nodes patch, but just in case it's not... :-)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ashesh Vashi <
>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Hi Dave/Team,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I have attached three patches targeting specific area of work.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -> backend_connection_status_management
>>> >>>> * Takes care of the connection status in the psycopg2 driver. And,
>>> when the connection is lost, it throws a exception with 503 http status
>>> message, and connection lost information in it.
>>> >>>> * Contains a change to allow to the flask application to propagate
>>> the exceptions even in the release mode.
>>> >>>> * Modification for utilising the existing password (while
>>> reconnection, if not disconnected explicitly).
>>> >>>> * Introduced a new ajax response message 'service_unavailable'
>>> (http status code: 503), which suggests temporary service unavailable.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -> manage_client_connect_lost
>>> >>>> * It handles the connection lost for different operations at client
>>> (browser) side.
>>> >>>> * Using the events to handle this situation.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -> remove_connection_status_check
>>> >>>> * We're currently return precondition_required (HTTP status code:
>>> 428) for the same, but - there is no consistent message/information
>>> available to identify it reliably as the server connection lost error
>>> (client side changes takes care of this situation, but - this patch is
>>> recommended for the whole change to work properly). This patch removes the
>>> connection status check from the individual nodes.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> TODO:
>>> >>>> * Browser tree - node expansion
>>> >>>> - When there is an error occurred during expanding the aci-tree
>>> node, it does not let the client handle the issue based on the status code,
>>> and error message, as it does not expose/share the error details with us.
>>> We will have to hack the aci-tree for the same.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> * Query Editor
>>> >>>> - Slick grid changes are in progress, hence - I did not touch the
>>> code for it, as it will lead to rework for either one of us (me, or
>>> Murtuza). I will take care of it as soon as the slick grid changes will be
>>> committed.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>> >>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Dave Page
>>> >>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> >>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>> >>>
>>> >>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> >>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Akshay Joshi 2016-08-24 12:57:41 Re: PATCH: SlickGrid integration in query tool (pgAdmin4)
Previous Message Ashesh Vashi 2016-08-24 08:47:30 Re: PATCH/s: RM#1387 - Bad handling of missing connection database server