Re: [pgAdmin][RM4755] pgAdmin does not work behind reverse proxy if in built server is used as it is

It is small improvement we can do to avoid overhead of checking headers in
each HTTP requests for proxies.

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:12 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> Sure, but is it going to make any real difference? I'd rather have it
> "just work" if possible.
>
> This isn't like compression which we expect to use noticable CPU cycles.
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:39 AM Murtuza Zabuawala <
> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We need to make it configurable, we don't require middleware when we are
>> running in Desktop mode.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:52 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:13 AM Aditya Toshniwal <
>>> aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:28 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 6:29 AM Aditya Toshniwal <
>>>>> aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached is the patch to allow pgAdmin to work behind proxy with its
>>>>>> in built server. I have used werkzeug fixer -
>>>>>> https://werkzeug.palletsprojects.com/en/0.15.x/middleware/proxy_fix/#module-werkzeug.middleware.proxy_fix
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this work with both X-Scheme and X-Forwarded-Proto headers as
>>>>> discussed?
>>>>>
>>>> The proxy fix work for all standard X-Forwarded-* headers. X-Scheme is
>>>> not used anywhere, X-Forwarded-Proto is more robust.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right, but our existing code uses X-Scheme (as per old advice since
>>> removed from the Flask website - see RM3149), and users have deployments
>>> that will be setup that way. We need to fall back to X-Scheme if it is
>>> present but X-Forwarded-Proto is not, to avoid breaking their installations.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I assume (as you haven't removed it) that it works in conjunction with
>>>>> the existing reverse proxy code?
>>>>>
>>>> Yes it should.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Cool :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>
>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>> Aditya Toshniwal
>>>> Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune
>>>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>