From: | Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#3140] Add service parameter |
Date: | 2018-03-13 04:35:48 |
Message-ID: | CAKKotZQCG7DzSbHKC-S6UxuHcogf4y0r8PiiFQi_E3tBjfxwGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@
> enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ashesh,
>>
>> I haven't implemented that intentionally because Khushboo is working on
>> the same for SSL and our code will conflict, So once Khushboo's patch gets
>> committed, I'll make changes for Service file as well.
>>
> No - that's a bad practice.
> You need to work on full feature set, not partial.
>
> If you have intentionally skipped that, you should have informed the list.
>
I forgot to create sub-task, will keep that in mind next time onwards.
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/3195
>
> -- Thanks, Ashesh
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Ashesh Vashi <
>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Murtuza/Dave,
>>>
>>> I have to reviewed/seen the patch yet.
>>> But - I have a question.
>>> Have we used the service file in the external tools for backup, restore,
>>> and import/export functionalities?
>>> If not - we should fix that asap.
>>>
>>> We had missed that during SSL support, and now - we're fixing that.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>
>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
>>>> jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Dave and Murtuza,
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding this patch we refactored the Javascript code so that is
>>>>> lives in a different file and added some tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also we found an issue with karma-jasmine that does not allow us to
>>>>> use jasmine 3.1 yet. You can find attached a patch that reverts that commit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good, but neither patch will apply (in fact, the Jasmine one
>>>> looks entirely backwards). One of the error messages was changed in
>>>> Murtuza's patch, and wasn't reflected in your update for example.
>>>>
>>>> Can you rebase please?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Victoria && Joao
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:46 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, patch applied!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PFA updated patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:29 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll change the name and send you updated patch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HI
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>>>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PFA patch to add service parameter in server dialog.
>>>>>>>>>> - Docs updated
>>>>>>>>>> - Test case added for Service ID parameter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please note,
>>>>>>>>>> I have extracted Connection class and Server manager class from
>>>>>>>>>> our own custom Psycopg2 driver module.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patch also covers RM#3120
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This patch seems a little confused. The "Service" and "Service
>>>>>>>>> ID" fields from pgAdmin 3 are very different things. The Redmine ticket
>>>>>>>>> seems to be asking for the Service field (the pg_service.conf service
>>>>>>>>> name), *not* Service ID (the operating system's service ID, used to
>>>>>>>>> start/stop the database server service).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Page
>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>
>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Khushboo Vashi | 2018-03-13 04:46:36 | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #2963 - Backup database, Restore database and Maintenance Database failed for é object. |
Previous Message | Murtuza Zabuawala | 2018-03-13 04:32:01 | Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#3139] Create proper template path if Windows |