From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Krzysztof Nienartowicz <krzysztof(dot)nienartowicz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables |
Date: | 2018-10-22 22:36:19 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f_cbMcgZG1ZZZyHY07uSgdST2RFXz66Hrxmq_4CYoJvuA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 October 2018 at 23:04, Krzysztof Nienartowicz
<krzysztof(dot)nienartowicz(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We see quite prohibitive 5-6x slowdown with native partitioning on in
> comparison to trigger based in PG9.5.
> This is clearly visible with highly parallel inserts (Can share
> flamediagrams comparing the two).
Does the 0001 patch here fix the problem? I imagined that it would be
the locking of all partitions that would have killed the performance.
> This basically excludes native partitioning from being used by us. Do you
> think your changes could be backported to PG10? - we checked and this would
> need quite a number of changes but given the weight of this change maybe it
> could be considered?
It's very unlikely to happen, especially so with the 0002 patch, which
I've so far just attached as a demonstration of where the performance
could end up.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-10-22 22:47:30 | Re: Multiple Wait Events for extensions |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-10-22 22:15:38 | Re: pgsql: Avoid duplicate XIDs at recovery when building initial snapshot |