Re: Converting NOT IN to anti-joins during planning

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Converting NOT IN to anti-joins during planning
Date: 2019-09-03 01:13:43
Message-ID: CAKJS1f_6HhOynk4dV7yLVBrwEvck4HtLBax-6NFvHUsuJ644yA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 09:21, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> David, will we hear from you on this patch during this month?
> It sounds from Antonin's review that it needs a few changes.

Thanks for checking. I'm currently quite committed with things away
from the community and it's unlikely I'll get to this in September.
I'll kick it out to the next 'fest now.

Antonin, Thank you for the review. I will respond to it when I get time again.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-09-03 01:53:09 Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2019-09-03 01:00:08 Re: pg_waldump and PREPARE