Re: commitfest 2018-07

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest 2018-07
Date: 2018-06-05 15:14:58
Message-ID: CAKJS1f_=qe_8pLOgrV=cBXgJiJZm4QVg46EqDECijyrgkinCLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6 June 2018 at 02:20, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I thought the idea was to clear out the underbrush of small, ready-to-go
> patches. How old they are doesn't enter into that.

I don't recall a 'fest where small ready to go patches getting
anything but priority.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-05 15:17:30 Re: commitfest 2018-07
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-06-05 15:07:03 Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?