From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Remove useless default clause in switch |
Date: | 2018-04-24 00:27:27 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9vS7W0MDp-DJ0ixg3bMhJo0vdU-vzjZR3CumvtaTP9cg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 24 April 2018 at 03:12, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Remove useless default clause in switch
>
> The switch covers all values of the enum driver variable, so having a
> default: clause is useless, even if it's only to do Assert(false).
Just for my own understanding:
I always thought that when all options were covered that we generally
kept a default just in case someone added another enum and forgot to
update the code.
I know generally those are with elog ERRORs but both would be designed
to alert a programmer, just at different times.
There are other examples in that file with the switch
(part_scheme->strategy), these are not using enums. I'd have to assume
that these must be different because of that.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-24 01:17:05 | Re: pgsql: Remove useless default clause in switch |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-04-23 20:59:43 | pgsql: Add GUC enable_partition_pruning |