| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken |
| Date: | 2018-06-15 01:59:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9rRZmMWGpwJQsQnj4pTjGYWqFLnzg+NHn4kwXg-vRqpA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 June 2018 at 02:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think that if possible, we should still allow a partitioned table
> in which all the rels are temp tables of the current session. What we
> have to disallow is (a) temp/permanent mixes and (b) temp tables from
> different sessions.
So, this used to work in v10. Is it fine to just pluck the feature out
of the v11 release and assume nobody cares?
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ideriha, Takeshi | 2018-06-15 02:20:21 | RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-06-15 01:38:29 | Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken |