Re: NOT IN subquery optimization

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "Li, Zheng" <zhelli(at)amazon(dot)com>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Date: 2019-03-05 23:56:40
Message-ID: CAKJS1f9_Yb6yWzYy=xQc=RYoJxCc_=vGUogrLeCL7MZ65nxSWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 12:25, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> That sounds fine. I'll take mine elsewhere since I didn't start this thread.

Moved to https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f82pqjqe3WT9_xREmXyG20aOkHc-XqkKZG_yMA7JVJ3Tw%40mail.gmail.com

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-03-05 23:58:07 Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-03-05 23:56:11 Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info