| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Derek Hans <derek(dot)hans(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11 |
| Date: | 2019-03-06 02:29:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9RGnd=fdEKWqyS3OBBUsR1Roy4wJmzadGhRe=Qf2_0LQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:26, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> > I've tried to put all this right again in the attached. However, I was
> > a bit unsure of what "but they can be moved into a foreign table if
> > the foreign data wrapper supports it." is referring to. Copying Robert
> > and Etsuro as this was all added in 3d956d9562aa. Hopefully, they can
> > confirm what is meant by this.
>
> Did you miss my reply on that thread?
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqF3gma5HfCJb4_cOk0_%2BLEpVc57EHdBfz_EKt%2BNu0hNYg%40mail.gmail.com
Yes. I wasn't aware that there were two threads for this.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2019-03-06 02:34:27 | Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11 |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-03-06 02:26:43 | Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shawn Debnath | 2019-03-06 02:29:59 | Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue |
| Previous Message | Ashwin Agrawal | 2019-03-06 02:27:45 | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |