| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans |
| Date: | 2018-10-26 04:39:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9L86y2wN_rTVKi2PM5S0Mnq_wAYS1YVu6R3ymupHObbA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 October 2018 at 16:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I recall Ronan Dunklau and Julien Rouhaud had proposed a patch for this
> last year, but the partitioning-related planning code hadn't advanced then
> as much as it has today, so they sort of postponed working on it.
> Eventually their patch was returned with feedback last November. Here's
> the link to their email in case you wanted to read some comments their
> proposal and patch got, although some of them might be obsolete.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2401607.SfZhPQhbS4%40ronan_laptop
Thanks. I wasn't aware, or ... forgot. Looks like back then was tricky
times to be doing this. Hopefully, the dust has settled a little bit
now.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-10-26 04:46:41 | Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards |
| Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2018-10-26 04:25:09 | Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards |