Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
Date: 2018-06-07 04:13:10
Message-ID: CAKJS1f9HMSU8KMWKMWA0q6L9mbPbdtpdK7zP5oVZY40G7rNd8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7 June 2018 at 15:57, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hm I was thinking this new function would be companion to ExecConstrains
> (a fact I used in the name I proposed,) so it'd be in the same file
> (probably right after it.)

Okay. v5 (attached) does it that way.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
remove_needless_additional_partition_check_v5.patch application/octet-stream 5.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-07 04:13:41 computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-06-07 04:10:39 Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?