From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS |
Date: | 2017-04-21 11:04:38 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9D2fX0nP2ti6EkWmrXB29EqawyiCqFFeJ0qCj4x6VvNA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 April 2017 at 22:30, Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd rather see:
>
> CREATE STATISTICS stats_name ON table(col);
>
> as this both mirrors CREATE INDEX and foreign keys with REFERENCES. It
> could also be extended to both more columns, expressions or other tables
> like so:
>
> CREATE STATISTICS stats ON t1(col1, col2 / 2), t2 (a,b);
>
> and even:
>
> CREATE STATISTICS stats ON t1(col1, col2 / 2), t2 (a,b) WITH (options)
> WHERE t2.a > 4;
How would you express a join condition with that syntax?
> This looks easy to remember, since it compares to:
>
> CREATE INDEX idx_name ON t2(a,b) WITH (options) WHERE t2.a > 4;
>
> Or am I'm missing something?
Sadly yes, you are, and it's not the first time.
I seem to remember mentioning this to you already in [1].
Please, can you read over [2], it mentions exactly what you're
proposing and why it's not any good.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f9HMeT+7adicEaU8heOMpOB5pKkCVYZLiEZje3DVutVPw@mail.gmail.com
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEZATCUtGR+U5+QTwjHhe9rLG2nguEysHQ5NaqcK=VbJ78VQFA@mail.gmail.com
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-04-21 12:25:42 | Re: On-disk format of SCRAM verifiers |
Previous Message | Tels | 2017-04-21 10:30:26 | Re: WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS |