From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round three |
Date: | 2018-07-05 21:55:06 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9BLz4uxbp2qS_pVA2R5ggYHL3Z7GLVHp15x30K81iW2w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 July 2018 at 09:41, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Committed.
>
> Thanks for handling this.
>
> Should we do this in REL_11_STABLE too? I vote yes.
Sorry for now paying much attention to this, but I've read through
what's been committed and I also think PG11 deserves this too.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-07-05 23:16:08 | Re: Non-reserved replication slots and slot advancing |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-07-05 21:44:25 | Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling |