Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?
Date: 2019-06-09 05:44:58
Message-ID: CAKJS1f97SGMrfvA67yZDEOyQB0Q2iocLYEcS+=i1P-oaKbDWVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 17:11, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry, but I think this is still an issue:
>
> > Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
> > divided by is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough
>
> I think it should say:
>
> | Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
> | divided is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough

Alright. I guess I misunderstood you. Updated patches are attached.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
part_doc_master_v4.patch application/octet-stream 5.3 KB
part_doc_pg11_v4.patch application/octet-stream 5.2 KB
part_doc_pg10_v4.patch application/octet-stream 5.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-06-09 10:47:42 Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-06-09 05:18:01 Re: Fix inconsistencies for v12