| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers |
| Date: | 2017-03-07 02:32:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f95JmN6aH4vbjOBNms3F3NaeHRg370QFpHCgbU2Kq_98A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> +1. How about changing the description of
> max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes,
> limited by max_parallel_workers"?
Thanks for looking.
Seems more accurate to say that it's "taken from
max_parallel_workers", maybe. You can't "take" more than what's there,
so perhaps the extra text is not required.
Patch attached.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| postgresql.conf.sample_fix_v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 896 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-03-07 02:33:27 | Re: Re: check failure with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2017-03-07 02:21:42 | Re: adding an immutable variant of to_date |