Re: partition -> partitioned

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partition -> partitioned
Date: 2018-05-17 02:40:04
Message-ID: CAKJS1f90u4HJovTZOnV7E+tF7cVqRYhLJHy7365CWqphKzUT4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17 May 2018 at 13:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Commit 499be013de6 used 'partition' where it really meant 'partitioned' in
> a few places including in a variable name. For example, what almost all
> places call 'partitioned_rels', make_partition_pruneinfo called
> 'partition_rels'.
>
> Attached a patch to make that uniform to avoid confusion.

Looks good to me.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-05-17 02:48:39 Re: partition -> partitioned
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-05-17 02:27:47 Re: Postgres 11 release notes