Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Date: 2019-03-26 02:12:52
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8jNwT6yO_vDRmcxtHyXnJkLaf1hfKAgZbPzOc33CB99Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 09:02, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> FTR this patch doesn't apply since single child [Merge]Append
> suppression (8edd0e7946) has been pushed.

Thanks for letting me know. I've attached v14 based on current master.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
mergeappend_to_append_conversion_v14.patch application/octet-stream 62.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-03-26 02:15:37 Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-03-26 02:11:00 Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]