Re: Parallel index creation does not properly cleanup after error

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel index creation does not properly cleanup after error
Date: 2018-03-14 12:16:47
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8ZEdNvoEwJXYPPp0KWbopeph6mwS6wv0ansRuf4S=+qQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12 March 2018 at 08:41, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:22 AM, David Rowley
>> A perhaps simple fix would be just to have ResetReindexPending() only
>> reset the list to NIL again and not try to raise any error.
>
> I noticed a very similar bug in ResetReindexProcessing() just before
> parallel CREATE INDEX was committed. The fix there was simply not
> throwing a "can't happen" error. I agree that the same fix should be
> used here. It's not worth enforcing !IsInParallelMode() in the reset
> functions; just enforcing !IsInParallelMode() in the set functions is
> sufficient. Attached patch does this.

Thanks for putting the patch together. Although in regards to your
proposed commit message in the patch, I'd disagree with me having just
reported it. I also investigated it and suggested a fix, which happens
to be exactly the fix you've used in the patch.

I've added this to the open items list for PG11.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-03-14 12:25:03 Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Previous Message Ildus Kurbangaliev 2018-03-14 12:05:16 Re: committing inside cursor loop