From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Phil Florent <philflorent(at)hotmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11 beta1 on Debian |
Date: | 2018-08-01 14:42:18 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f8RHYCXU3tEWagDzoTk0n1KoPw2FA8PByrMiyV6owpR1w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 July 2018 at 01:03, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I've attached a patch intended for master which is just v2 based on
> post 5220bb7533.
In [1] I mentioned that I think that bug should be fixed as part of
this bug fix too. It just seems a little strange to fix that one
separately when without the v3 patch for this fix the code still won't
work correctly when any subplans are present which don't belong in the
partition hierarchy.
I've attached a patch which can be applied on top of the v3 patch.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
remove_incorrect_partprune_assert.patch | application/octet-stream | 549 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-08-01 15:07:04 | Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-08-01 14:35:09 | Re: FailedAssertion on partprune |